Bug 146956

Summary: oocalc cannot print or preview multi-page data
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Eddie Sturgis <eddie.sturgis>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Dan Williams <dcbw>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: caolanm
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-16 12:57:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eddie Sturgis 2005-02-02 23:16:37 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
With data that spans multiple pages, the print preview and print
options only show the first page of data, and it runs past the footer
and past the page edge.  Observed this on my i686 and my x86_64
installations.  Both were upgraded via up2date.  Before upgrading the
i686 installation, I verified that version 1.1.2 handled the data with
no problem.  The problem is not specific to a certain data file.  It
occurred when I opened a new file, and filled a single column with
several (50) rows of numbers.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice 1.1.3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open oocalc
2.Fill the first 50 rows of column A with numbers (any data should work)
3.Select <File> <Page Preview>

    

Actual Results:  Line 44 is at the bottom edge of the page, several
lines past the footer, which displays the page #.  There is no 'page
2' containing the rest of the data.  Selecting <File> <Print> and
selecting <All> (the default) prints exactly what is seen in the preview.

Expected Results:  There should have been a page break and multiple
pages displayed.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eddie Sturgis 2005-02-04 16:55:33 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 146431 ***

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2005-02-16 12:57:40 UTC
close as dup