Bug 1469580

Summary: [Docs][RFE][Director] Deployment & Management of Containerized RHOSP
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Component: documentationAssignee: Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Martin Lopes <mlopes>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 12.0 (Pike)CC: dmacpher, dprince, lbopf, mburns, mlopes, ohochman, srevivo, yohmura
Target Milestone: gaKeywords: Documentation, FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 12.0 (Pike)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: docs-accepted
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-19 04:21:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1415556    
Bug Blocks: 1476046    

Description Dan Macpherson 2017-07-11 14:08:38 UTC 
== DECRIPTION ==
Major feature for OSP12

== DOCS IMPACT ==
Requires documentation for new scenario
Comment 1 Dan Macpherson 2017-07-21 02:06:11 UTC 
Upstream documentation:

https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/install/containers_deployment/index.html
Comment 2 Lucy Bopf 2017-07-26 23:57:16 UTC 
Clearing target release pending docs triage.
Comment 3 Lucy Bopf 2017-08-08 02:36:31 UTC 
Assigning to Dan for review.
Comment 7 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-08 00:00:14 UTC 
Hi Martin,

I think this is ready for peer review. The content has already been merged as a part of beta:

Here the new chapter on configuring the registry details:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12/html/director_installation_and_usage/configuring-registry_details

I've also revised the basic CLI scenario to use a containerized approach:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12/html/director_installation_and_usage/chap-configuring_basic_overcloud_requirements_with_the_cli_tools

Let me know if there's any feedback you had on these sections.

Let's also fold the peer review for BZ#1461172 into this BZ since they're both dealing with the same section.
Comment 10 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-12 06:53:44 UTC 
Additional feedback implemented and committed to master.