Bug 1469872

Summary:	[Docs][RFE][Director][UI] Auto-discovery/Introspection data in UI
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Charelle Collett <ccollett>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	12.0 (Pike)	CC:	beth.white, ccollett, lbopf, mburns, opavlenk, srevivo
Target Milestone:	ga	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	docs-accepted
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-12-19 04:20:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1422642
Bug Blocks:

Description Dan Macpherson 2017-07-12 03:18:55 UTC

== DECRIPTION ==
As a deployer, I want the application to auto-discover locally attached storage details. Disks, Type, Controller, Size, Device Name, Topology, RAID, Vendor, Firmware rev

== DOCS IMPACT ==
Integrating introspection data into the UI

Comment 1 Lucy Bopf 2017-08-08 03:36:20 UTC

Assigning to Dan for review.

Comment 4 Dan Macpherson 2017-11-23 05:39:45 UTC

I've update the content on the node information screen, which has been released as part of beta:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12-beta/html/director_installation_and_usage/chap-configuring_basic_overcloud_requirements_with_the_ui_tools#sect-Accessing_for_the_Web_UI

Ola, can you have a look and let me know if this covers the feature?

Comment 5 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-11 02:55:21 UTC

No response in several weeks. Switching to peer review. Link to content here:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12/html/director_installation_and_usage/chap-configuring_basic_overcloud_requirements_with_the_ui_tools#sect-Accessing_for_the_Web_UI

Comment 6 Charelle Collett 2017-12-11 09:30:02 UTC

Section 7.2 looks good to me Dan.  Is it just that section that needs to be reviewed?

Comment 7 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-11 13:34:30 UTC

There are some other sections but I think they're being reviewed in separate BZs.