Bug 147094
Summary: | autofs in U4 doesn't work on NIS mounts that did in U3! | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | Richard Freeman <rhfreeman> |
Component: | autofs | Assignee: | Jeff Moyer <jmoyer> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | CC: | cfeist |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-02-04 15:33:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Richard Freeman
2005-02-04 12:46:00 UTC
It should be noted for mounts on the "LAN" from the box, they work all the time from what I can tell. It is WAN'd mounts which are causing the problem. Although how autofs knows this, I don't know. The further away the remote NFS host is, the worse it gets. Sensitive to response times maybe? Thanks, Thank you for adding that last bit. I believe we have a fix for this in current RPMs. Could you try the RHEL 3 rpm found here: http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/.bz147094/ If you need an x86_64 rpm, just let me know. Thanks! [root@osno-cs04 root]# /usr/sbin/automount --version Linux automount version 4.1.3-91 [root@osno-cs04 root]# cd ~jlowther [root@osno-cs04 jlowther]# df -k . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on bofs2a:/vol/bofs2avol3/HOME_IS/jlowther 20971520 17360440 3611080 83% /home/jlowther We have a winner! Yes, please supply the x86-64 version also. Any idea when this is going to be released properly? Thanks for the quick reply also. :) Rich Okay, the x86_64 package has been uploaded. Note that this is an unofficial build. The version of the fix you are using is not the final, either. I may ask you to try another package, if it is convenient for you. This bug is a duplicate of another, so marking it as such. -Jeff *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 146887 *** We can try another package, that'll be no problem at all to help out. Question - could we use autofs from U3 instead with U4 to resolve the issue? Thanks Jeff! Rich Yes, if the version from U3 works for you, it is quite acceptable to continue using it. |