Bug 1471939
| Summary: | pre-jewel "osd rm" incrementals are misinterpreted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
| Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Josh Durgin <jdurgin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Bara Ancincova <bancinco> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 1.3.3 | CC: | anharris, ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, icolle, jdurgin, kchai, tserlin, vakulkar |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 2.4 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-2:10.2.7-39.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-38redhat1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.CRUSH calculations for removed OSDs match on kernel clients and the cluster
When an OSD was removed with the `ceph osd rm` command, but was still present in the CRUSH map, the CRUSH calculations for that OSD on kernel clients and the cluster did not match. Consequently, kernel clients returned I/O errors. The mismatch between client and server behavior has been fixed and kernel clients do not return the I/O errors anymore in this situation.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-10-17 18:12:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1473436, 1479701 | ||
|
Description
Vikhyat Umrao
2017-07-17 17:47:46 UTC
Moving to 2.5 until 2.4 proper is released. Looks good, thanks Bara! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2903 |