Bug 147322
Summary: | openoffice.org-kde missing from x86_64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexandre Oliva <oliva> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-02-10 12:37:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-07 10:37:06 UTC
What is its purpose, and why does it need to be multilib? It doesn't need to be multilib. OOo is not built for x86_64, so we use the i386 binaries. Except for -kde, that is just missing. 'mutilib' == 'the same arch as multilib OOo'. What is its relation to OOo, why does it need to be the same bitwidth ( as opposed to OOo-style-gnome.) Nevermind, added. At least, this will cause it to get pulled into the tree. This could cause mass chaos on multilib arches, though. Will have to see how it percolates out in rawhide. I suspect something went wrong with this fix. Today's and yesterday's x86_64 rawhide were missing not only openoffice.org-kde, but also *all* other i386 packages that used to be there before. Seems to have been fixed in yesterday's rawhide, thanks! |