Bug 1475289
Summary: | Dynamic DNS no longer works post upgrade to F26. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jason Burgess <jason.donald.burgess> |
Component: | bind99 | Assignee: | Petr Menšík <pemensik> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | brian, cegolf, code, drippsb, jason.donald.burgess, jpopelka, mruprich, msehnout, patrick, pemensik, pzhukov, stig, thozza |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-03-28 14:23:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jason Burgess
2017-07-26 12:00:48 UTC
I'm seeing similar results. Using dhcp-server-4.3.5-7.fc26.x86_64 and bind-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64, dynamic updates to DNS stopped after upgrading from F25->F26. Manually updating DNS/BIND with nsupdate works. I had similar problems. Using dhcp-server-4.3.5-7.fc26.x86_64. Workaround is "dnf downgrade dhcp-server" witch will downgrade these packages. Packages Altered: Downgrade bind99-libs-9.9.9-5.P8.fc26.x86_64 @fedora Downgraded 9.9.10-1.P2.fc26.x86_64 (unknown) Downgrade bind99-license-9.9.9-5.P8.fc26.noarch @fedora Downgraded 9.9.10-1.P2.fc26.noarch (unknown) Downgrade dhcp-client-12:4.3.5-6.fc26.x86_64 @fedora Downgraded 12:4.3.5-7.fc26.x86_64 (unknown) Downgrade dhcp-common-12:4.3.5-6.fc26.noarch @fedora Downgraded 12:4.3.5-7.fc26.noarch (unknown) Downgrade dhcp-libs-12:4.3.5-6.fc26.x86_64 @fedora Downgraded 12:4.3.5-7.fc26.x86_64 (unknown) Downgrade dhcp-server-12:4.3.5-6.fc26.x86_64 @fedora Downgraded 12:4.3.5-7.fc26.x86_64 @updates This will make DHCP update DDNS again. I can confirm this after spending hours trying to figure out whats wrong: issue and the Workaround to Downgrade dhcp-server are as described. I think this is a duplicate of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471747 Looks like there's a pending F26 update candidate for this: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=919645 Confirmed - issue is resolved in released 9.9.10-1.P3. I'm a bit confused. I have carefully followed this thread and also the thread in fedoraforum: https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1791595 I'm sure that 9.9.10-1.P3 fixes many things successfully, but doesn't seem to fix the initial problem. I certainly am not an expert, but I can make a few observations: 1. DDNS worked on my systems for many years through f25. 2. After upgrading to f26 and making no changes to DDNS configuration, DDNS stopped working. DNS and DHCP both continued to work, but not DDNS. 3. 'dnf downgrade dhcp-server' caused DDNS to work on f26 with no configuration changes. DNS and DHCP continue to work. The downgrade resulted in: Installed Packages bind99-libs.x86_64 9.9.9-5.P8.fc26 @fedora dhcp-server.x86_64 12:4.3.5-6.fc26 @fedora Available Packages bind99-libs.x86_64 9.9.10-2.P3.fc26 updates dhcp-server.x86_64 12:4.3.5-9.fc26 updates 4. If I upgrade dhcp-server under f26, with no configuration changes, DDNS stops working while DNS and DHCP continue to work. 5. I can upgrade and downgrade at any time, but the results don't change: downgrading gives me a working DDNS; upgrading breaks DDNS. Perhaps the fix in bind99-libs-9.9.10-1.P3.x86_64 did not make it through to bind99-libs-9.9.10-2.P3.fc26.x86_64? Thanks to all who are working on this issue, but it seems that the fix hasn't fixed the original issue. Correction to my original statement: "Confirmed - issue is resolved in released bind99-libs-9.9.10-2.P3.fc26.x86_64". Thank you for clearing up my confusion. 'dnf upgrade' and DDNS works fine with f26. No more need for a downgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1471747 *** |