Bug 147571

Summary: pexpect fails to build on x86_64 due to differing library paths
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Toshio Kuratomi <toshio>
Component: pexpectAssignee: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-10 20:59:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch to update macros so x86_64 builds work none

Description Toshio Kuratomi 2005-02-09 13:56:53 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
The build of pexpect on x86_64 fails.  This is due to listing the files to be included using the arch specific directories.  Because x86_54 is multilib we need to put them into the arch independent directories instead.  Updating to the macros recommended in the latest fedora-rpmdeveltools fixes this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pexpect-0.99-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. On x86_64 attempt rpmbuild -ba pexpect.spec
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  Errors as seen at http://fedoraproject.org/extras/3/build-logs/x86_64/pexpect.log

Expected Results:  Build completes with a pexpect rpm package.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Toshio Kuratomi 2005-02-09 14:05:10 UTC 
Created attachment 110868 [details]
Patch to update macros so x86_64 builds work

Patch against the CVS devel branch to get the x86_64 build to work.  This
updates the spec to use the latest macros specified in
fedora-rpmdevtools::spectemplate-python.spec

Tested on x86_64 by Aurelian Bompard:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-February/msg00194.html
Comment 2 Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-02-10 19:26:48 UTC 
Panu, if the patch here it's okay (it's okay in my eyes) just say and
I'll commit.
Comment 3 Panu Matilainen 2005-02-10 19:43:00 UTC 
Sure, go ahead. For these cases if things seem ok just go ahead and
commit, no need to get "approval" from me. I'm kinda out of business
anyway until I get CVS access (which has nothing to do with RH, I just
need to get an "OK" from my employees lawyers who are being sloooooow
about this)
Comment 4 Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-02-10 20:22:11 UTC 
>Sure, go ahead.
Committed and build requested.

>For these cases if things seem ok just go ahead and
>commit, no need to get "approval" from me

Okay. 

Panu, Toshio, can any of you close this bug? Thanks.