Bug 147625 (rhn-amd64)
| Summary: | x86_64 host support for RHN Satellite / Proxy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Debbie McGrath <dmcgrath> | ||||
| Component: | Release | Assignee: | Tom Madden <tmadden> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 510 | CC: | cperry, jadb, jpazdziora | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | None | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2008-01-18 15:22:34 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 154849, 156458, 158008, 161385, 161402, 163612 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 248641 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Debbie McGrath
2005-02-09 21:42:03 UTC
*** Bug 122675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Will it be a RHEL3 / 4 feature? Created attachment 132743 [details]
A brief doc describing how to get proxy working on RHEL3 64 bit
Attached is a brief document describing the steps needed to get RHN Proxy 4.0
working on RHEL3 64 bit OS.
Re-assaining bugs from the old RHN product manager to the new one. Can someone clarify which version of RHN Satellite (if any) will be supported running on x86_64 OS? This issue is blocking "rhn500h-features" which would seem to indicate that this will be supported in RHN 5.0.0, but a message on rhn-satellite[1] seems to indicate that this will not be the case. Thanks. [1]http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhn-satellite/2006-October/msg00085.html Isn't this a duplicate of sat510-64bit bugzilla itself? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 248641 *** |