Bug 1476482

Summary:	AppStream metadata for Tucnak package are missing
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	AsciiWolf <mail>
Component:	tucnak	Assignee:	Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	drusek, jskarvad, lucilanga
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-07-03 21:08:23 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description AsciiWolf 2017-07-29 13:34:50 UTC

Description of problem:

There is not any appdata.xml/metainfo.xml file available in the Tucnak package. Because of this, Tucnak cannot be found and/or installed using the GNOME Software application or another package manager UI based on AppStream.


Steps to Reproduce:

1. Open GNOME Software.
2. Type "tucnak".

Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2017-08-15 06:32:30 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle.
Changing version to '27'.

Comment 2 AsciiWolf 2018-01-05 15:06:20 UTC

Any news?

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2019-02-19 17:08:33 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 30 development cycle.
Changing version to '30'.

Comment 4 AsciiWolf 2020-01-19 13:14:20 UTC

Still missing on Fedora 31.

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2020-08-11 15:25:54 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 33 development cycle.
Changing version to 33.

Comment 6 AsciiWolf 2021-05-14 13:45:17 UTC

Still missing.

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2021-05-26 12:41:11 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 8 Ben Cotton 2021-08-10 13:41:50 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle.
Changing version to 35.

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2022-11-29 16:45:17 UTC

This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '35'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 10 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 14:51:04 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle.
Changing version to 38.

Comment 11 Daniel Rusek 2023-06-29 15:14:07 UTC

I have submitted a Pull Request that should fix the issue:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tucnak/pull-request/1