Bug 1477015
| Summary: | [RFE] A non-admin users with view permissions are unable to view templates details since they are only displayed in the edit form. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Jayant Bhatia <jbhatia> |
| Component: | Provisioning Templates | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Roman Plevka <rplevka> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.2.10 | CC: | akarimi, andrew.schofield, asharvit, bbuckingham, bkearney, dgross, dhlavacd, jbhatia, jcallaha, mhulan, rchauhan, sgraessl, sokeeffe, tbrisker |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature, PrioBumpPM, Triaged, UserExperience |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-01-19 21:34:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jayant Bhatia
2017-08-01 05:02:23 UTC
to see a template box (edit form) user must have edit_provisioning_templates permission, could you verify that adding this permissions helps? I think it's consistent with all other pages, view permission only allows user to display the resources in index page. (In reply to Marek Hulan from comment #1) > to see a template box (edit form) user must have edit_provisioning_templates > permission, could you verify that adding this permissions helps? I think > it's consistent with all other pages, view permission only allows user to > display the resources in index page. I can confirm that. However, if I have view_provisioning_templates I *should* be able to view the templates. I can do this via hammer (and the API). The web UI should reflect these permissions. I agree but that would mean displaying a different, read-only, form. As I said, it works this way for every resource, good example is subnet. If we change it, we should change it everywhere. A simple solution might be just disabling the submit button. I'll change the BZ title to match it. As you can imagine this would be a big change so it can take a while. Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/20973 from this bug *** Bug 1487989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you. Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in approximately a month. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you. Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you. |