Bug 147752

Summary: inotify support
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro>
Component: gaminAssignee: Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideKeywords: Patch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-02-11 11:04:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
gamin.spec file
none
inotify's backend support for gamin
none
Diff for the .spec file none

Description Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 22:31:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
I have made some minor modifications to the gamin .spec file to include inotify
backend support. Credit goes to Robert Love for the patch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.0.23-1

How reproducible:
N/A

Steps to Reproduce:
N/A
  
Actual results:
Patch gamin to add inotify backend support.

Expected results:
N/A

Additional info:
See attached patch and .spec file.
Comment 1 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 22:31:59 UTC 
Created attachment 110946 [details]
gamin.spec file
Comment 2 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-10 22:33:00 UTC 
Created attachment 110947 [details]
inotify's backend support for gamin
Comment 3 Daniel Veillard 2005-02-10 22:47:56 UTC 
How does this relates to patches made by John McCutchan ?
Like for example:
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gamin-list/2005-February/msg00005.html

What is the diff for the spec file ? There is a spec file
in the gamin tarball.
In general I don't think bugzilla is the right place for these discussions,
the gamin mailing-list is.

Daniel
Comment 4 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-11 10:26:33 UTC 
I did not intend this to be a discussion, but a proposal for inclusion.
The attached patch here is identical to the one posted in gamin-list by John
McCutchan. I erroneously credited Robert Love for the patch instead of John
McCutchan. Robert deserves credit for the kernel patch.
Comment 5 Felipe Alfaro Solana 2005-02-11 10:27:33 UTC 
Created attachment 110960 [details]
Diff for the .spec file
Comment 6 Daniel Veillard 2005-02-11 11:04:54 UTC 
Already applied upstream, no diff needed for the spec file, this will
be included in the next release, and I don't think keeping patches
within source RPMs while they are integrated upstream and doesn't work
for the current shipped kernel to be a good idea. All this really need
to be done upstream, on the list, any other options is just a waste of
time.

Daniel