Bug 1479452
Summary: | Exposing routes based on a sharded router using NAMESPACE_LABELS takes too long. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jiří Mencák <jmencak> |
Component: | Networking | Assignee: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> |
Networking sub component: | router | QA Contact: | zhaozhanqi <zzhao> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | ||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | aos-bugs, pcameron, rchopra |
Version: | 3.6.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | aos-scalability-36 | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-08-09 18:20:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jiří Mencák
2017-08-08 14:58:06 UTC
Can you confirm that it is only when route is created on a newly created project? On an existing project (one that has synced in ~10 minutes) the routes appear as quickly as in a non-sharded router. If yes, this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355711 (In reply to Rajat Chopra from comment #1) > Can you confirm that it is only when route is created on a newly created > project? Yes, this is correct. Also, if I wait for the routes to be exposed correctly (those max ~10 minutes), I delete the project and re-create the project under the same name, the routes are exposed correctly immediately. So this only seems to affect completely new namespaces for which routes have not been resynced with the router. So, yes a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355711. Also duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479295 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1479295 *** |