Bug 148003
Summary: | does not build on x86_64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora> |
Component: | synce | Assignee: | Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | CC: | andreas.bierfert |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 0.9.1-2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-08-23 20:24:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Thorsten Leemhuis
2005-02-14 17:14:52 UTC
I commited a "ExcludeArch: x86_64" to cvs for FC-3 and devel; Leaving this bug open to track issue. Hm, I commited and build 0.9.1 for fc3/fc4/devel and fc3/fc4 work just fine (at least for the building part). Could someone with x86_64 access please verify that the x86_64 version really works. And if by any chance someone has a clue about this I could push devel as well: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs//development/273-synce-0.9.1-3.fc5/i386/build.log Same spec on fc4/fc3 works fine. > Hm, I commited and build 0.9.1 for fc3/fc4/devel and fc3/fc4 work just fine (at > least for the building part). Could someone with x86_64 access please verify > that the x86_64 version really works. I don't have any proper ce-devices to test (I need those afaics). Sorry. I think we should just close this bug. Andreas, that okay for you? > And if by any chance someone has a clue about this I could push devel as well: > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs//development/273-synce-0.9.1-3.fc5/i386/build.log > > Same spec on fc4/fc3 works fine. No idea. Sorry. Fine with me... I guess if it does not work x86_64 users will complain ^^ |