Bug 1480449

Summary:	[DOCS] Remove ose-recycler from openshift 3.6 docs
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Jianwei Hou <jhou>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Traci Morrison <tmorriso>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Jianwei Hou <jhou>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.6.0	CC:	aos-bugs, jhou, jokerman, mmccomas, nschuetz, rchanter, tlarsson
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-01-04 16:23:29 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jianwei Hou 2017-08-11 07:01:14 UTC

Document URL: 
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/install_config/install/disconnected_install.html

Section Number and Name: 

Describe the issue: 
The ose-recycler is deprecated, it's no longer available and  should be removed from 3.6 documentation.

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:

Comment 2 Romain Chantereau 2017-12-11 11:01:12 UTC

It seems the image still exists in v3.6.173.0.63: https://access.redhat.com/containers/?tab=tags#/registry.access.redhat.com/openshift3/ose-recycler

For the 3.6, the bugs does not seem to be related to document but to the images availability?

Comment 3 Vikram Goyal 2017-12-13 01:09:28 UTC

Hi there Jianwei,

If it is only deprecated it means that is still available to use so should continue having it in the documentation. Do you want us to put a deprecation message for it?

Comment 6 Traci Morrison 2017-12-19 16:41:56 UTC

This appears to be removed from 3.6 docs:

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/install_config/install/disconnected_install.html

Can you please confirm? Thanks.

Comment 8 Traci Morrison 2017-12-20 16:40:09 UTC

Thanks @jhou. 

Vikram, I am marking this bug as closed. The information was removed. I was not able to find any correlated PRs in our repo.