Bug 1485274

Summary: There is a reachable assertion abort in function jpc_dec_process_sot() of JasPer that will lead to remote denial of service attack.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: owl337 <v.owl337>
Component: jasperAssignee: Josef Ridky <jridky>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.5-AltKeywords: Security
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-28 07:22:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1488958    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Triggered by "./imginfo -f POC2" none

Description owl337 2017-08-25 09:12:09 UTC
Created attachment 1318058 [details]
Triggered by  "./imginfo -f POC2"

Description of problem:

There is a reachable assertion abort in function jpc_dec_process_sot() of JasPer that will lead to remote denial of service attack.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

<= latest version

How reproducible:

./imginfo -f POC2


Steps to Reproduce:

$ ./imginfo -f POC2
Aborted (core dumped)

The gdb debugging information is listed below:
(gdb) set args POC2
(gdb) r 
...

Breakpoint 2, jpc_dec_process_sot (dec=<optimized out>, ms=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c:515
515					abort();
(gdb) list 
510			  the main header? */
511			if (dec->ppmstab) {
512				/* Convert the PPM marker segment data into a collection of streams
513				  (one stream per tile-part). */
514				if (!(dec->pkthdrstreams = jpc_ppmstabtostreams(dec->ppmstab))) {
515					abort();
516				}
517				jpc_ppxstab_destroy(dec->ppmstab);
518				dec->ppmstab = 0;
519			}
(gdb) bt
#0  jpc_dec_process_sot (dec=<optimized out>, ms=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c:515
#1  0x00007ffff7b49ceb in jpc_dec_decode (dec=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c:424
#2  jpc_decode (in=<optimized out>, optstr=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c:261
#3  0x00007ffff7b059ce in jas_image_decode (in=<optimized out>, fmt=<optimized out>, optstr=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/base/jas_image.c:442
#4  0x0000000000401bab in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/appl/imginfo.c:238

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff71f8428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54
54	../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) 

jpc_dec_process_sot (dec=<optimized out>, ms=<optimized out>)
    at /home/icy/secreal/jasper/src/libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c:515
510			  the main header? */
511			if (dec->ppmstab) {
512				/* Convert the PPM marker segment data into a collection of streams
513				  (one stream per tile-part). */
514				if (!(dec->pkthdrstreams = jpc_ppmstabtostreams(dec->ppmstab))) {
515					abort();
516				}
517				jpc_ppxstab_destroy(dec->ppmstab);
518				dec->ppmstab = 0;
519			}


Actual results:

crash

Expected results:

crash

Additional info:


Credits:

This vulnerability is detected by team OWL337, with our custom fuzzer collAFL. Please contact ganshuitao   and chaoz.cn if you need more info about the team, the tool or the vulnerability.

Comment 2 Josef Ridky 2017-08-25 10:37:07 UTC
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue to us. We appreciate the feedback and use reports such as this one to guide our efforts at improving our products. That being said, this bug tracking system is not a mechanism for requesting support, and we are not able to guarantee the timeliness or suitability of a resolution.

If this issue is critical or in any way time sensitive, please raise a ticket through the regular Red Hat support channels to ensure it receives the proper attention and prioritization to assure a timely resolution. 

For information on how to contact the Red Hat production support team, please visit:
    https://www.redhat.com/support/process/production/#howto

For proper identification of issue are required properly filled following information:

- Description of problem
- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable)
- Steps to Reproduce
- Actual results
- Expected results
- Additional info

Comment 3 Josef Ridky 2019-06-28 07:22:32 UTC
Due no reaction from Red Hat Security team and no CVE assigned, I am closing this as WONTFIX.