Bug 1485722 (deepin-file-manager)
| Summary: | Review Request: deepin-file-manager - Deepin File Manager | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | sensor.wen |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <eclipseo> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | eclipseo, package-review, robinlee.sysu |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | eclipseo:
fedora-review+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-07-22 13:30:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1465889 | ||
|
Description
sensor.wen
2017-08-27 16:18:11 UTC
mpv-libs-devel is not available through normal Fedora repositories. It is available on RPMFusion though, so you should probably propose this package there. https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dde-file-manager/issues/60 I have told the upstream that provides an option to disable MPV. SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00594625-deepin-file-manager/deepin-file-manager.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00594625-deepin-file-manager/deepin-file-manager-4.2.5-1.fc26.src.rpm Removed mpv dependency BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libffmpegthumbnailer) is also only available on RPMFusion. SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00597972-deepin-file-manager/deepin-file-manager.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00597972-deepin-file-manager/deepin-file-manager-4.2.5-1.fc26.src.rpm Disable ffmpeg Hello,
There's a couple of typo, it doesn't break anything but are kind of annoying for comprehension:
- first the name of the patch:
deepin-file-manager-diable_ffmpeg.patch → deepin-file-manager-disable_ffmpeg.patch
- then inside of the patch itself:
SUPPORT_FFMEPG → SUPPORT_FFMPEG
- There are several issue regarding ownership of directories:
/usr/lib64/dde-dock
/usr/lib64/dde-dock/plugins
/usr/lib64/dde-file-manager
/usr/lib64/dde-file-manager/plugins
/usr/lib64/dde-file-manager/plugins/previews
/usr/share/dde-desktop
/usr/share/dde-desktop/translations
/usr/share/dman
/usr/share/usb-device-formatter
/usr/share/usb-device-formatter/translations
/usr/include/dde-file-manager
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/dde-file-manager-plugins
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/gvfs
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/private
All those dirs are created by your package but aren't owned. Please add a %dir macro for each one.
- You forgot to call desktop-file-validate on your desktop files:
%check
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/%{repo}.desktop
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/dde-computer.desktop
desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/dde-trash.desktop
- Also I couldn't install the package because it depends on deepin-manual, which I don't have. And is it really necessary to make a file manager depends on the manual?
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or
generated", "Unicode strict", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "LGPL (v2.1)",
"BSD (3 clause)". 1645 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/deepin-file-manager/review-
deepin-file-manager/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/dde-desktop/translations,
/usr/lib64/dde-file-manager/plugins, /usr/lib64/dde-dock/plugins,
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/private, /usr/lib64/dde-file-manager,
/usr/share/usb-device-formatter, /usr/lib64/dde-file-
manager/plugins/previews, /usr/share/dde-desktop, /usr/include/dde-
file-manager, /usr/share/dman, /usr/include/dde-file-manager/gvfs,
/usr/lib64/dde-dock, /usr/share/usb-device-formatter/translations,
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/dde-file-manager-plugins
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/usb-device-
formatter/translations, /usr/lib64/dde-dock, /usr/share/dde-desktop,
/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services, /usr/include/dde-file-manager/gvfs,
/usr/share/dbus-1, /etc/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces,
/usr/include/dde-file-manager, /usr/lib64/dde-dock/plugins,
/usr/include/dde-file-manager/private, /usr/lib64/dde-file-
manager/plugins, /usr/lib64/dde-file-manager, /usr/share/usb-device-
formatter, /etc/dbus-1/system.d, /usr/share/dde-desktop/translations,
/usr/share/dbus-1/services, /usr/include/dde-file-manager/dde-file-
manager-plugins, /usr/lib64/dde-file-manager/plugins/previews,
/usr/share/dman
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in deepin-file-manager
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in deepin-file-manager
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in deepin-
file-manager-debuginfo
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2938880 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: deepin-file-manager-4.2.5-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-file-manager-devel-4.2.5-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-desktop-4.2.5-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-file-manager-debuginfo-4.2.5-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-file-manager-4.2.5-1.fc28.src.rpm
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/dde-file-manager/mimetypes/audio.mimetype
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/dde-file-manager/mimetypes/image.mimetype
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/dde-file-manager/templates/newTxt.txt
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-file-manager
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-file-manager-daemon
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-file-manager-pkexec
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-property-dialog
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-xdg-user-dirs-update.sh
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usb-device-formatter
deepin-file-manager.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usb-device-formatter-pkexec
deepin-file-manager-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-file-manager-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: no-documentation
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dde-desktop
deepin-desktop.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/dde-computer.desktop value "Deepin;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Deepin"; values extending the format should start with "X-"
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/dde-computer.desktop gvfs-open
deepin-desktop.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/dde-trash.desktop value "Deepin;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Deepin"; values extending the format should start with "X-"
deepin-desktop.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/dde-trash.desktop gvfs-open
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 18 warnings.
Perfect, package accepted. (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-file-manager This is already in Rawhide. Closing on behalf of the Deepin Desktop packaging effort. |