Bug 1487893

Summary: Review Request: ghc-hourglass - Simple performant time related library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora, package-review, zebob.m
Target Milestone: ---Flags: zebob.m: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-14 21:54:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1256076, 1488606, 1489306, 1493789, 1494336, 1494676, 1494879, 1494886, 1495018, 1495476, 1496285, 1496543, 1513301    

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-09-03 03:14:10 UTC
Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-hourglass.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-4.git.0.d4ff3d0.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
Simple time library focusing on simple but powerful and performant API

The backbone of the library are the Timeable and Time type classes.

Each Timeable instances can be converted to type that has a Time instances, and
thus are different representations of current time.

Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-09-03 03:14:15 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21622534

Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-09-03 03:15:13 UTC
*** Bug 1256075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-03 15:14:23 UTC
Hello,

Same issue regarding the docs:

Issues:
=======
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 1157120 bytes in 46 files.
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD
     (unspecified)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-hourglass/review-ghc-
     hourglass/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[ ]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1208320 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-hourglass-devel-0.2.10-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-4.fc26.src.rpm
ghc-hourglass.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance
ghc-hourglass.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance
ghc-hourglass.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-hourglass.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance
ghc-hourglass.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

Comment 4 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-09-03 19:22:27 UTC
Split out docs

Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/git-annex/ghc-hourglass.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/git-annex/ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.git.0.bd7deb5.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
Simple time library focusing on simple but powerful and performant API

The backbone of the library are the Timeable and Time type classes.

Each Timeable instances can be converted to type that has a Time instances, and
thus are different representations of current time.

koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21637446

Comment 5 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-04 11:46:52 UTC
All good, package accepted.

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-09-04 18:44:54 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-hourglass

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-09-05 19:44:39 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fb14ad17df

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-09-05 19:45:15 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c83f925cb7

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-09-06 22:29:53 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c83f925cb7

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2017-09-07 14:31:54 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fb14ad17df

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2017-09-14 21:54:17 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2017-09-30 06:18:15 UTC
ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.