Bug 1489884

Summary: [RFE] rebase llvm/clang to 5.0
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Pat Riehecky <riehecky>
Component: llvmAssignee: Dave Johansen <davejohansen>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: ajax, davejohansen, dmalcolm, ignatenko, jakub, jistone, kyle, petersen, scottt.tw, siddharth.kde, tstellar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-21 04:59:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pat Riehecky 2017-09-08 14:50:12 UTC 
Description of problem:
Can llvm/clang be rebased to the recently published 5.0 version?

Additional info:
http://releases.llvm.org/download.html#5.0.0
http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Comment 1 Josh Stone 2017-09-08 16:22:35 UTC 
I expect the more likely path is to create a new llvm5 package, like the current llvm3.9.  (nobody bothered with llvm4 though...)
Comment 2 Tom Stellard 2017-09-08 18:06:02 UTC 
I've started working on this, and I'm waiting for a side-tag to be created for rawhide: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6927
Comment 3 Josh Stone 2017-09-08 20:23:46 UTC 
Tom, note this RFE is for epel7.
Comment 4 Tom Stellard 2017-09-08 22:01:16 UTC 
(In reply to Josh Stone from comment #3)
> Tom, note this RFE is for epel7.

Ah thanks, I missed that.
Comment 5 Tom Stellard 2017-09-08 22:01:52 UTC 
Review request for llvm4.0 package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489983
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2017-12-21 04:59:20 UTC 
(In reply to Josh Stone from comment #1)
> I expect the more likely path is to create a new llvm5 package, like the
> current llvm3.9.  (nobody bothered with llvm4 though...)

Right, rebase is not really acceptable for EPEL for this important component.

llvmXY packages from Fedora should be built for EPEL 7.