Bug 1489983
Summary: | Review Request: llvm4.0 - Compatibility package for LLVM 4.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tom Stellard <tstellar> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jistone, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-02-01 22:22:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tom Stellard
2017-09-08 22:00:05 UTC
The main llvm package has a backport for ARM codegen which is important for rust, rust-lang-llvm-pr67.patch. Any reason you didn't include this here? You don't need to go through the review process simply to import a parallel-installable version of an existing package. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process Yes, finding this is unpleasantly difficult, and unfortunately our new fedrepo-req process doesn't play well with things. But it appears to me that the package is named properly, and is indeed a versioned import of the llvm package, so I'll just approve this and you can import it with this ticket as a reference. (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm4.0 |