Bug 149117
Summary: | Build of tetex RPMs fails because of missing file "ls-R" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joachim Frieben <jfrieben> |
Component: | tetex | Assignee: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | CC: | pknirsch |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-02-28 15:29:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joachim Frieben
2005-02-18 21:59:12 UTC
Identical output for the rebuild of "tetex-3.0-1". The log context you presented here looks weird. Could you please send the whole compile log here as an attachment? I don't think it's a general problem since I build both the versions with no problems locally and also our build system and other users had no complains about it. I have found the reason for the observed behaviour: I've got a local "texmf" tree, and via the "su" command the TEXMF shell variable got exported to the both local accounts (install/root) which I had used to try to rebuild the binary packages. After correction of this misleading setting, the packages do build as expected. Unless one does not consider rpmbuild taking into account a local TEXMF shell variable as undesirable, the issue can be qualified a "NOT A BUG". Ok, thanks for the bugreport anyway. Jindrich |