Bug 1491505
Summary: | Cannot Scale to more than 116 subnets and VMs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Sai Sindhur Malleni <smalleni> | |
Component: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates | Assignee: | Sai Sindhur Malleni <smalleni> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sai Sindhur Malleni <smalleni> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 12.0 (Pike) | CC: | abond, amuller, apevec, bhaley, chrisw, jjoyce, jlibosva, lhh, lpeer, mburns, nsantos, nyechiel, oblaut, pablo.iranzo, pneedle, racedoro, rhel-osp-director-maint, sauchter, sgaddam, smalleni, srelf, srevivo, tvignaud | |
Target Milestone: | ga | Keywords: | Triaged | |
Target Release: | 12.0 (Pike) | Flags: | sauchter:
needinfo-
|
|
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | scale_lab | |||
Fixed In Version: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-7.0.3-0.20171023134947.8da5e1f.el7ost | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1512489 (view as bug list) | Environment: |
N/A
|
|
Last Closed: | 2017-12-13 22:08:57 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1512489 |
Description
Sai Sindhur Malleni
2017-09-14 03:28:12 UTC
[root@overcloud-controller-0 heat-admin]# rpm -qa | grep dnsmasq dnsmasq-2.76-2.el7.x86_64 dnsmasq-utils-2.66-21.el7.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474515 has some good info on a similar bug reported to the RHEL team by Joe Talerico. I can confirm that doing sysctl -w fs.inotify.max_user_instances=256 >> /etc/sysctl.conf to raise the value from 128 to 256 results in more subnets, VMs being created. Question is should we bump this default in RHEL or have Director bump it at least for overcloud nodes? I would think bumping this in Director would be best since it might not apply to all RHEL users. Assuming there is no negative side-effect setting to it's maximum might be best. Maybe someone on the RHEL team can help with that. Patch was merged Ramon, BZ for OSP10 backport Sorry, I failed to link the actual BZ in the previous comment. Here it is, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508030 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:3462 |