Description of problem: CephFS supports ACLs in the security namespace, but SELinux refuses to run on it.
Nobody on our team is very clear on what needs to be done to make SELinux happy, so I was asked to create this ticket.
CephFS team is working on own SELinux policy module. We don't have any ceph related policy in rhel. Maybe we could ask them.
Comment 13Giridhar Ramaraju
2019-08-05 13:06:16 UTC
Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate.
Regards,
Giri
Comment 14Giridhar Ramaraju
2019-08-05 13:08:57 UTC
Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate.
Regards,
Giri
Comment 17Federico Lucifredi
2020-03-10 05:21:37 UTC
4.1 will start on 8.1 and be smoke-tested with 8.2 later. The rigorous testing will be on 8.1
let's keep the target at 4.1. This is low-risk and earlier delivery helps us with validation (we can get other teams to pitch in). We can label it a tech preview to isolate the team from production expectations.
Adding Gfarnum. Tracking in Trello for visibility.