Bug 1497042
| Summary: | Unable to mount dynamically provisioned persistant volumes using vSphere | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaspreet Kaur <jkaur> |
| Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Pavel Pospisil <ppospisi> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jianwei Hou <jhou> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 3.6.1 | CC: | aos-bugs, aos-storage-staff, bchilds, eparis, jhou, jkaur, jsafrane, ppospisi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.6.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause: volumePath that includes datastore name is parsed incorrectly. The same applies to volumePath that includes datacluster and datastore names.
Consequence: It is not possible to attach persistent volumes that have the above described volumePath values.
Fix: volumePath is now parsed correctly.
Result: Persistent volumes that have the above described volumePath values are attached correctly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-12-07 07:11:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jaspreet Kaur
2017-09-29 05:33:32 UTC
It's hard to guess what's wrong without reproducing the bug locally. @Jianwei, can you or someone from your team try to reproduce the bug on our systems and give me access there? I suspect that it's caused by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44007 and it's fixed by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/44868, but that's just a wild guess. The PR is not merged yet Tested on v3.6.173.0.63 Volume mounted successfully when storageclass has 'datastore' parameter. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3389 |