Bug 1497188
| Summary: | hy_subject_get_best_solution() does not consider architecture whitelist set by dnf_sack_set_arch() | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alex Kanavin <ak> |
| Component: | libdnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 29 | CC: | ak, dmach, igor.raits, jmracek, rpm-software-management |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-30 17:05:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Alex Kanavin
2017-09-29 12:24:48 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle. Changing version to '28'. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'. The similar problem we used to have with src arch. Now they are filtered out using with_src=false. Please is still your request relevant? Not really relevant anymore. We have meanwhile implemented repo setup in such a way that packages with incorrect architectures never make it to the repo (via whitelisting). So there's no way to even easily verify this anymore. Thanks a lot for response. |