Bug 1497957

Summary: katello-backup fails with /usr/share/ruby/fileutils.rb:125: warning: conflicting chdir during another chdir block
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk>
Component: Backup & RestoreAssignee: Christine Fouant <cfouant>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3.0CC: andrew.schofield, bbuckingham, cfouant, jomitsch
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-02-21 16:44:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1456379    

Description Peter Ondrejka 2017-10-03 08:39:05 UTC
Description of problem:

Running katello-backup on Satellite server:

~]# katello-backup -y /var/tmp/ --online-backup
Starting backup: 2017-10-03 04:25:40 -0400
Creating backup folder /var/tmp/katello-backup-20171003042541
Generating metadata ... 
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100    94  100    94    0     0    479      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--   482
Done.
Backing up config files... 
foreman proxy certs tar file is not present on the system in path  please move the file back to that location or generate a new one on the main server.
Cleaning up backup folder and starting any stopped services... 
/usr/share/ruby/fileutils.rb:125: warning: conflicting chdir during another chdir block
Done.

Also note the message about the proxy certs, the script incorrectly determines if it is running on capsule or not.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
satellite-6.3.0-19.0.beta.el7sat.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Expected results:
Backup is successful, script correctly determines if running on proxy.

Comment 2 John Mitsch 2017-10-03 13:02:44 UTC
Hey Peter,

We were relying on the presence of the foreman-proxy-content rpm to determine if a Satellite is a foreman-proxy or a Satellite, but there was a recent change and the fpc package is installed on a Satellite. Talking with Eric, he said he is going to try to remove the package from the Satellite, and if this isn't possible we will figure out a different check.

For now, you can manually set that check to false in any scripts to do testing.

-John

Comment 3 Christine Fouant 2017-10-03 17:10:14 UTC
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/21183 from this bug

Comment 4 Satellite Program 2017-10-03 20:41:08 UTC
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/21183 has been resolved.

Comment 5 Peter Ondrejka 2017-10-16 09:26:37 UTC
Seems like the actual backup script didn't arrive:

~]# katello-backup /var/tmp/backup

DEPRECATION WARNING: katello-backup is deprecated and will
be removed in the next Satellite release. It is being replaced by
satellite-backup. Redirecting to satellite-backup now.

/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- /usr/sbin/backup.rb (LoadError)
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/sbin/satellite-backup:10:in `<main>'

~]# satellite-backup -h
/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- /usr/sbin/backup.rb (LoadError)
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
	from /usr/sbin/satellite-backup:10:in `<main>'

Also, about the DEPRECATION WARNING, are we really going to remove the thing in next release, why? Redirect is in place, I don't see any risk in keeping the legacy option functional. Also, is there a documentation bug about this change?

Comment 8 Peter Ondrejka 2017-10-23 12:24:56 UTC
Verified on satellite-6.3.0-21.0.beta.el7sat.noarch and satellite-capsule-6.3.0-21.0.beta.el7sat.noarch

Comment 9 Bryan Kearney 2018-02-21 16:41:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336

Comment 10 Bryan Kearney 2018-02-21 16:44:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336