Bug 1501523
| Summary: | [ASB] APB provisioning fails to start when attempted directly after "apb push"ing a new APB. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Derek Whatley <dwhatley> |
| Component: | Service Broker | Assignee: | Dylan Murray <dymurray> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jian Zhang <jiazha> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.7.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, dymurray, jmatthew, smunilla, wmeng |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.7.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-11-28 22:16:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Derek Whatley
2017-10-12 18:09:58 UTC
The error seems to be related to this function call reporting a 400: https://github.com/openshift/ansible-service-broker/blob/3568cfe733824deff6379331ae862df7ac829760/pkg/broker/broker.go#L638. This error goes away as soon as the broker auto bootstraps. The error seems to be related to this function call reporting a 400: https://github.com/openshift/ansible-service-broker/blob/3568cfe733824deff6379331ae862df7ac829760/pkg/broker/broker.go#L638. This error goes away as soon as the broker auto bootstraps. 1, Init a new local APB and then push it to the ASB by "apb push". 2, Provision this new APB in Web UI, but got the below error: [root@preserve-jiazha-1027master-etcd-1 ~]# oc get pods -n apb-push-hello-apb-prov-95xp8 NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE apb-4884e0d1-6d1c-4417-ac10-50455c073265 0/1 ImagePullBackOff 0 38m And, as described in this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504712, there are two workarounds, if I use one of them, will it affect the test results? I test this bug used two workarounds above, did not get errors that described in above. Or could you provide me your example APB? I will double check this issue. Jian, Using the workaround will not affect the test results. Since using the workaround fixed the problem for you it tells me the patch worked as expected. The workaround was the best way for you to test this so the test passed. We need to add the capability for the tool to work with remote hosts... but that is out of the scope of this bug. Dylan Jian, It looks like this fix was accidentally removed from the master branch here: https://github.com/openshift/ansible-service-broker/commit/439ce3e217aa48d9a9fc097bf26760f9b55898bd#diff-55aca6fb74ac953881309c295ee9441eL1034 I am working to figure out if that was intentional and I will get it resolved. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3188 |