Bug 1505932

Summary: [RFE] Show "Static Query" in Job invocations overview
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Beat Rubischon <brubisch>
Component: Remote ExecutionAssignee: Aditi Puntambekar <apuntamb>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2.12CC: apuntamb, aruzicka, inecas, peter.vreman
Target Milestone: 6.6.0Keywords: FutureFeature, PrioBumpPM
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: tfm-rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-1.6.6-1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-22 12:46:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1122832    

Description Beat Rubischon 2017-10-24 15:08:49 UTC
Description of problem:

Running the same job against different targets results in a confusing overview page. Adding the "Static Query" would give at least a hint of the targets of historic jobs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Satellite 6.2.12

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run a job against "name = hosta"
2. Run a job against "name = hostb"

Actual results:

Both jobs look identical on the "Job invocations" list https://satellite/job_invocations

Expected results:

Additional column shows target of the jobs.

Additional info:

Comment 4 Adam Ruzicka 2017-11-08 08:54:21 UTC
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/21595 from this bug

Comment 5 Peter Vreman 2019-05-20 10:33:27 UTC
Confirmed this is fixed in already in 6.5 
Sat6.5.0 has tfm-rubygem-foreman_remote_execution-1.6.7-19.el7sat.noarch

Comment 6 Peter Ondrejka 2019-06-17 14:27:22 UTC
Verified in Satellite 6.6 snap 8, search query is now displayed in job invocations overview

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2019-10-22 12:46:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3172