Bug 150683
Summary: | Wrong update advisory id for ipsec-tools | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bernd Bartmann <bernd.bartmann> |
Component: | ipsec-tools | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2 | CC: | rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-03-09 18:12:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bernd Bartmann
2005-03-09 17:05:11 UTC
It's an update of the advisory. Ok, but you released a new set of rpms with a new version number. Something here is still very wrong with the way updates are handled. We never had something like this before and it makes it very hard to keep track of updates. It would be a lot better to have a new advisory id and to mention that this one obsoletes the old advisory. Another thing is that we still don't have ONE common format for the advisories. Every rpm packager does the announcement a little different and some don't even announce their new packages. Something has to be done about this. Also for RHEL the update announcements are GPG signed by a central key. This should also happen for FC's update announcements. Your second point is: a) already in bugzilla somewhere b) waiting on infrastructure to handle these things. Deferring. |