Bug 1506842
| Summary: | modular repos have inconsistent names | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh> | ||||
| Component: | fedora-modular-repos | Assignee: | Troy Dawson <tdawson> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | tdawson | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-11-06 16:26:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1492243 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Updated for both f27 and rawhide (f27) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=991491 (rawhide) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=995697 |
Created attachment 1344073 [details] Screenshot showing the differing repo names Description of problem: After installing Modular Server, attempting to do updates results in seeing: ``` [root@try ~]# dnf update Fedora 27 - x86_64 - Test Updates [...] Fedora 27 - x86_64 - Updates [...] Fedora Modular Server 27 - x86_64 [...] ``` This is inconsistent. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-modular-repos-27-5.module_76d0cc8b.noarch Fedora-Modular-27-20171026.n.3 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf clean all 2. dnf update 3. Actual results: Some repos are listed as "Fedora 27", others as "Fedora Modular Server 27" Expected results: All of them should be consistent Additional info: We should not standardize on "Fedora 27", since that would be confusing with traditional Fedora. We should consider also that Server will not be the sole consumer of these repos in the future, so maybe "Fedora 27 Modular" would be a good common name?