Bug 1506933
| Summary: | suitesparse: use openblas instead of atlas | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> |
| Component: | suitesparse | Assignee: | Jiri Kastner <cz172638> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 29 | CC: | cz172638, dakingun, deekej, nphilipp, orion, xjakub |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-18 09:47:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1506952 | ||
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle. Changing version to '28'. Ping? OpenBLAS is now available for s390x as well, so all primary arches are covered. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/suitesparse/pull-request/1 I will merge the above in a week or so if there's no response here. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'. Merged and built three weeks ago. |
Description of problem: Please BuildRequire: openblas instead of atlas where available (currently: x86_64 %{ix86} armv7hl %{power64} aarch64 s390x, see %{openblas_arches} macro defined in openblas-srpm-macros package). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.4.6-10.fc27 Additional information: A lot of benchmarks around the net suggest openblas is faster than ATLAS in most workloads: https://github.com/tmolteno/necpp/issues/18 http://blog.nguyenvq.com/blog/2014/11/10/optimized-r-and-python-standard-blas-vs-atlas-vs-openblas-vs-mkl/ https://freddie.witherden.org/pages/blas-gemm-bench/ http://nghiaho.com/?p=1726 Many Fedora packages have switched to openblas already (e.g. scalapack and all dependent ones and numpy).