Bug 1508822

Summary:	java-9-openjdk-headless pulls in java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Marko Myllynen <myllynen>
Component:	java-9-openjdk	Assignee:	jiri vanek <jvanek>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	27	CC:	dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek, mvala, omajid, sgehwolf
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-11-02 10:25:45 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marko Myllynen 2017-11-02 10:03:13 UTC

Description of problem:
java-9-openjdk-headless requires javapackages-tools which in turn pulls java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless which obviously is unwanted.

Perhaps this is more a javapackages-tools issue and should be reassigned but filing initially against java-9-openjdk to raise awareness. Thanks.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
javapackages-tools-5.0.0-7.fc27.noarch
java-9-openjdk-headless-9.0.0.181-7.fc27.x86_64

Comment 1 Severin Gehwolf 2017-11-02 10:25:45 UTC

Thanks. We are aware. This is a duplicate of bug 1500288.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1500288 ***

Comment 2 Marko Myllynen 2017-11-02 13:15:25 UTC

FWIW, I'll note here for the record that before bug 1500288 is fixed, after installing java-9-openjdk on Fedora 27, the default java alternative gets set to java-1.8.0-openjdk.

Comment 3 jiri vanek 2017-11-02 13:27:28 UTC

(In reply to Marko Myllynen from comment #2)
> FWIW, I'll note here for the record that before bug 1500288 is fixed, after
> installing java-9-openjdk on Fedora 27, the default java alternative gets
> set to java-1.8.0-openjdk.

Another note: This behaviour will persist  fixing of this bug. Jdk9 is to fragile   to have higher priority then jdk8