Bug 150895

Summary: system-config-cluster: Naming of Resources in tree view
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite Reporter: Derek Anderson <danderso>
Component: redhat-config-clusterAssignee: Jim Parsons <jparsons>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: cluster-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-20 16:26:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Derek Anderson 2005-03-11 19:30:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
The convention in the rest of the tree view appears to be to display
the item by "name=" if it has that attribute available.  Under the
Resources part of the tree this is less intuitive.

If a resource of type fs is created and its name is "123" it displays
in the tree as "Resource 123".  A couple of things about this:  I
already know it's a resource from its parent.  And there's no
immediate indication of what "123" is without digging down into its
properties.

Suggestion: Name these things with "type" followed by "name".  If name
is not available, as with IP address, use the "ip address" attribute.
 So in my previous example "Resource 123" becomes "Filesystem 123". 
Instead of "Resource IP Address" it might be "IP Address 10.1.1.100".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-cluster-0.9.11-1.0

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jim Parsons 2005-03-28 11:21:10 UTC 
Fixed in 0.9.17-1.0
Comment 2 Corey Marthaler 2005-04-20 16:26:40 UTC 
fix verified in 0.9.29-1.0.