Bug 150981

Summary: Unpackaged files for bind if sdb and libbind are disabled
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: bindAssignee: Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideKeywords: EasyFix
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 9.3.1-2_FC4 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-15 19:09:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2005-03-13 12:15:17 UTC
Description of problem:
Unpackaged files for bind if sdb and libbind are disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bind-9.3.1-1

How reproducible:
Everytime, see below.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set in bind.spec:
%{?!SDB:    %define SDB         0}
%{?!LIBBIND:%define LIBBIND     0}
2. rpmbuild -ba bind.spec
3. Get the list of unpackaged files.
  
Actual results / Expected results:
Replace:
  gunzip < %{SOURCE9} | (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share; tar -xpf -)
by
  %if %{LIBBIND}
  gunzip < %{SOURCE9} | (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share; tar -xpf -)
  %endif
and rebuilding should work both times.

Comment 1 Jason Vas Dias 2005-03-13 19:21:19 UTC
Oops! Yes, you are right, that line should be conditional on %{LIBBIND}.
I will make it so in the next version.

But it doesn't really make any difference: the bind, bind-libs, bind-utils,
bind-devel and bind-chroot packages obtained are identical with or without
%{LIBBIND} and/or %{SDB} enabled or disabled - just don't install the 
bind-sdb or bind-libbind-devel packages if you don't want them .  The 
bind-sdb package provides /usr/sbin/named_sdb, leaving the /usr/sbin/named
unchanged, and no BIND code uses libbind in any case. 

Why do you need to rebuild the BIND package ? If you need to install 
BIND 9.3.1 on an FC3 system, they are avaiable in pre-built form at:
  http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/BIND/9.3.1/FC-3

 

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2005-03-13 20:51:37 UTC
I rebuilt the bind package for a special and absolutely non-supported system 
environment, which hasn't postgresql(-devel) for example. Otherwise I wouldn't 
have notice this small mistake. And - if it is conditional - it maybe should 
also work ;-)

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2005-04-15 19:09:52 UTC
Fix was built in Rawhide today, closing now.