Bug 1510268

Is this scenario reproducing?

Looks like a segfault in qr_readv_cached function. 
Did u get a core dump/ can u share it? 
Could you generate a core and share the core file for further analysis?

(In reply to Sanoj Unnikrishnan from comment #1)
> Is this scenario reproducing?
> 
> Looks like a segfault in qr_readv_cached function. 
> Did u get a core dump/ can u share it? 
> Could you generate a core and share the core file for further analysis?

(gdb) bt
#0  __memmove_ssse3 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3.S:1614
#1  0x00007f924b9dc329 in memcpy (__len=1576, __src=<optimized out>, __dest=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/bits/s
#2  qr_readv_cached (frame=frame@entry=0x7f925be7fb7c, qr_inode=0x7f92300c8110, size=size@entry=4096, offset=offset
#3  0x00007f924b9dc57a in qr_readv (frame=0x7f925be7fb7c, this=0x7f924c0eb300, fd=0x7f923001cfa0, size=4096, offset
#4  0x00007f925e36bbec in default_readv_resume (frame=0x7f925be685ec, this=0x7f924c0ec780, fd=0x7f923001cfa0, size=
#5  0x00007f925e38ab52 in call_resume_wind (stub=<optimized out>) at call-stub.c:2118
#6  0x00007f925e38b14d in call_resume (stub=0x7f925b90b5a0) at call-stub.c:2576
#7  0x00007f924b7d2678 in open_and_resume (this=this@entry=0x7f924c0ec780, fd=fd@entry=0x7f923001cfa0, stub=stub@en
#8  0x00007f924b7d488f in ob_readv (frame=0x7f925be685ec, this=0x7f924c0ec780, fd=<optimized out>, size=<optimized
#9  0x00007f924b5c53e7 in mdc_readv (frame=0x7f925be8c1b0, this=0x7f924c0edb40, fd=0x7f923001d00c, size=4096, offse
#10 0x00007f924b3a98d1 in io_stats_readv (frame=0x7f925be931e4, this=0x7f924c0eef60, fd=0x7f923001d00c, size=4096,
#11 0x00007f925e35f510 in default_readv (frame=0x7f925be931e4, this=0x7f924c0f04c0, fd=0x7f923001d00c, size=4096, o
#12 0x00007f924b193ffe in meta_readv (frame=0x7f925be931e4, this=0x7f924c0f04c0, fd=0x7f923001d00c, size=4096, offs
#13 0x00007f9254f3c664 in fuse_readv_resume (state=0x7f9220135ce0) at fuse-bridge.c:2210
#14 0x00007f9254f34a65 in fuse_resolve_done (state=<optimized out>) at fuse-resolve.c:644
#15 fuse_resolve_all (state=<optimized out>) at fuse-resolve.c:671
#16 0x00007f9254f347a8 in fuse_resolve (state=0x7f9220135ce0) at fuse-resolve.c:635
#17 0x00007f9254f34aae in fuse_resolve_all (state=<optimized out>) at fuse-resolve.c:667
#18 0x00007f9254f34023 in fuse_resolve_continue (state=state@entry=0x7f9220135ce0) at fuse-resolve.c:687
#19 0x00007f9254f34748 in fuse_resolve_fd (state=0x7f9220135ce0) at fuse-resolve.c:547
#20 fuse_resolve (state=0x7f9220135ce0) at fuse-resolve.c:624
#21 0x00007f9254f34a8e in fuse_resolve_all (state=<optimized out>) at fuse-resolve.c:660
#22 0x00007f9254f34ad0 in fuse_resolve_and_resume (state=0x7f9220135ce0, fn=0x7f9254f3c440 <fuse_readv_resume>) at
#23 0x00007f9254f476ce in fuse_thread_proc (data=0x7f925f003d50) at fuse-bridge.c:4903
#24 0x00007f925d1c3dc5 in start_thread (arg=0x7f922638a700) at pthread_create.c:308
#25 0x00007f925cb0a28d in getxattr () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
#26 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) f 4
#4  0x00007f925e36bbec in default_readv_resume (frame=0x7f925be685ec, this=0x7f924c0ec780, fd=0x7f923001cfa0, size=4096, offset=0, flags=32768, xdata=0x0) at defaults.c:1405
1405            STACK_WIND (frame, default_readv_cbk, FIRST_CHILD(this),
(gdb) list
1400
1401    int32_t
1402    default_readv_resume (call_frame_t *frame, xlator_t *this, fd_t *fd,
1403                          size_t size, off_t offset, uint32_t flags, dict_t *xdata)
1404    {
1405            STACK_WIND (frame, default_readv_cbk, FIRST_CHILD(this),
1406                        FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->readv, fd, size, offset, flags, xdata);
1407            return 0;
1408    }

jhkim,
I'd suggest you to upgrade to latest bits: 3.12.2
You seem to be using an old gluster release: 3.7.1

Let me know if the upgrade to 3.12.2 helps and then close the BZ appropriately.

Patch https://review.gluster.org/18146, which addresses the issue is available upstream with version 3.12.2