Bug 1511034
Summary: | vdoformat program erroneously prints "Exceeds maximum number of slabs" for case where index size is too big | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Bryan Gurney <bgurney> |
Component: | vdo | Assignee: | Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jakub Krysl <jkrysl> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.5 | CC: | awalsh, jkrysl, limershe |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 6.1.0.57 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-10 15:47:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bryan Gurney
2017-11-08 15:09:43 UTC
In a case where the device has enough space to create the index, but does not have enough space to create a full slab (default size 2 GB), this error will appear: vdo: ERROR - vdoformat: formatVDO failed on '/dev/TEST/backing': VDO Status: Out of space The test logical volume above was 4 GB in size; it was enough to contain the 2.5 GB UDS index, but not enough to contain a single 2 GB slab. *** Bug 1505748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** vdo-6.1.0.55-10 with 5.5T disk: # vdo create --name vdo2 --device /dev/sdg --indexMem 1000 --verbose Creating VDO vdo2 modprobe kvdo vdoformat --uds-checkpoint-frequency=0 --uds-memory-size=1000 /dev/sdg vdo: ERROR - vdoformat: formatVDO failed on '/dev/sdg': VDO Status: Out of space THe new indication does not specifically says there is not enough space for the index, but it clearly says it is a space issue, which is good enough. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0871 |