Bug 15121
Summary: | NFS Locking fails with large amounts of data | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Need Real Name <lawrence> | ||||
Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | nahay | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2002-12-15 00:36:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Need Real Name
2000-08-02 14:10:41 UTC
Created attachment 1814 [details]
tar file of test case, please read README file, modify Makefile macro and type make
Further testing has been done. If the remote directory is on HP 10.20 it also fails. If the remote directory is on another Linux 2.2.12 machine or a Network Appliance file server the problem does not occur. The NetApp might be an anomoly because it is on a gigabit network and may be consuming the data VERY fast coming off my 100TX linux machines. assigned to johnsonm I tried to append this previously but it somehow disappeared.... A customer of mine had his remote file systems mounted with mount -o rw,nolock .... In this configuration the problem did NOT occur. In my opinion this is a crazy way to mount a file system since it bypassed NFS locking all together and could lead to corruption problems, but it did serve to isolate the bug to NFS locking. With 'nolock' the lock is maintained locally on the client and the problem did not occur. Jay Hello, Has there been any progress on this issue? Thanks, Michael Could you try our 2.2.19 errata kernel? it has majorly revamped NFS code, including NFSv3 support. |