Bug 1513336 (CVE-2017-17045, xsa247)

Summary: CVE-2017-17045 xsa247 xen: Missing p2m error checking in PoD code (XSA-247)
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Adam Mariš <amaris>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: ailan, drjones, imammedo, jforbes, knoel, m.a.young, mrezanin, pbonzini, rkrcmar, robinlee.sysu, security-response-team, vkuznets, xen-maint
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-28 12:43:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1518214    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Adam Mariš 2017-11-15 08:48:56 UTC
ISSUE DESCRIPTION
=================

Certain actions require modification of entries in a guest's P2M
(Physical-to-Machine) table.  When large pages are in use for this
table, such an operation may incur a memory allocation (to replace a
large mapping with individual smaller ones).  If this allocation
fails, the p2m_set_entry() function will return an error.

Unfortunately, several places in the populate-on-demand code don't
check the return value of p2m_set_entry() to see if it succeeded.

In some cases, the operation was meant to remove an entry from the p2m
table.  If this removal fails, a malicious guest may engineer that the
page be returned to the Xen free list, making it available to be
allocated to another domain, while it retains a writable mapping to
the page.

In other cases, the operation was meant to remove special
populate-on-demand entries; if this removal fails, the internal
accounting becomes inconsistent and may eventually hit a BUG().

The allocation involved comes from a separate pool of memory created
when the domain is created; under normal operating conditions it never
fails, but a malicious guest may be able to engineer situations where
this pool is exhausted.

IMPACT
======

An unprivileged guest can retain a writable mapping of freed memory.
Depending on how this page is used, it could result in either an
information leak, or full privilege escalation.

Alternatively, an unprivileged guest can cause Xen to hit a BUG(),
causing a clean crash - ie, host-wide denial-of-service (DoS).

VULNERABLE SYSTEMS
==================

All systems from Xen 3.4 are vulnerable.

Only x86 systems are vulnerable.  ARM is not vulnerable.

x86 PV VMs cannot leverage the vulnerability.

Only systems with 2MiB or 1GiB HAP pages enabled are vulnerable.

The vulnerability is largely restricted to HVM guests which have been
constructed in Populate-on-Demand mode (i.e. with memory < maxmem):

x86 HVM domains without PoD (i.e. started with memory == maxmem, or
without mentioning "maxmem" in the guest config file) also cannot
leverage the vulnerability, in recent enough Xen versions:
4.8.x and later: all versions safe if PoD not configured
4.7.x: 4.7.1 and later safe if PoD not configured
4.6.x: 4.6.4 and later safe if PoD not configured
4.5.x: 4.5.4 and later safe if PoD not configured
4.4.x and earlier: all versions vulnerable even if PoD not configured

The commit required to prevent this vulnerability when PoD
not configured is 2a99aa99fc84a45f505f84802af56b006d14c52e
xen/physmap: Do not permit a guest to populate PoD pages for itself
and the corresponding backports.

MITIGATION
==========

Running only PV guests will avoid this issue.

Running HVM guests only in non-PoD mode (maxmem == memory) will also
avoid this issue.  NOTE: In older releases of Xen, an HVM guest can
create PoD entries itself; so this mitigation will not be effective.

Specifying "hap_1gb=0 hap_2mb=0" on the hypervisor command line will
also avoid the vulnerability.

Alternatively, running all x86 HVM guests in shadow mode will also
avoid this vulnerability.  (For example, by specifying "hap=0" in the
xl domain configuration file.)

External References:

http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-247.html

Comment 2 Adam Mariš 2017-11-28 12:39:20 UTC
Acknowledgments:

Name: the Xen project
Upstream: George Dunlap (Citrix)

Comment 3 Adam Mariš 2017-11-28 12:42:26 UTC
Created xen tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1518214]