Bug 1513669

@Johan this is for GLPI ;)

Updated to 6.0.2

Spec: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpmailer/php-phpmailer6.git/plain/php-phpmailer6.spec?id=14399d94b9aac19eb768d63466c7b323644bc6ed
Srpm: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpmailer6-6.0.2-1.remi.src.rpm

Updated to 6.0.3

Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpmailer/php-phpmailer6.git/plain/php-phpmailer6.spec?id=850bf2de8bbd2df4d7981977854879c60a711dce
Srpm URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.remi.src.rpm

 - Group: and %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} are not needed.

Package approved.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "LGPL", "Unknown or generated". 105 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/php-
     phpmailer6/review-php-phpmailer6/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/php/PHPMailer(php-
     PHPMailer)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 163840 bytes in 31 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

PHP:
[x]: Run phpci static analyze on all php files.
     Note: phpCompatInfo version 5.0.11 DB version 1.28.0 built Jan 09 2018
     08:43:55 CET static analyze results in /home/bob/packaging/review/php-
     phpmailer6/review-php-phpmailer6/phpci.log


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc28.noarch.rpm
          php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc28.src.rpm
php-phpmailer6.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Autoloader -> Auto loader, Auto-loader, Freeloader
php-phpmailer6.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoload -> auto load, auto-load, tautology
php-phpmailer6.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Autoloader -> Auto loader, Auto-loader, Freeloader
php-phpmailer6.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usr -> use, us, user
php-phpmailer6.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoload -> auto load, auto-load, tautology
php-phpmailer6.src: W: strange-permission makesrc.sh 755
php-phpmailer6.src: W: invalid-url Source0: php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-44d49ba.tgz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

Thanks for the review

SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4392

And
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4393
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4394

(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-phpmailer6

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-225a8b6ce9

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-723d9c742c

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-225a8b6ce9

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-723d9c742c

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

php-phpmailer6-6.0.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.