Bug 1513768
Summary: | [3.6] Allow egress router to run on non-default interface | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Dan Winship <danw> |
Component: | Networking | Assignee: | Dan Winship <danw> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Meng Bo <bmeng> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.6.1 | CC: | aos-bugs, bbennett, bleanhar, bmeng, danw, dyuen, erich, hongli, mcurry, mgarciam, rhowe |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.6.z | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
Feature: The "assign-macvlan" pod annotation can now take the name of a network interface rather than just "true" or "false".
Reason:
Result: egress-routers can now be run on a non-default network interface
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1513764 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2017-12-14 21:02:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1513764 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Dan Winship
2017-11-15 22:43:11 UTC
Merged... how do we get a hotfix built? (In reply to Dan Winship from comment #1) > https://github.com/openshift/ose/pull/929 (plus https://github.com/openshift/ose/pull/936 to fix the build afterward) verified in atomic-openshift-3.6.173.0.83-1.git.0.1f70b16.el7.x86_64 and passed. Just for reference: The annotation will still accept true and false pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true" this allows it to accept further values like pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "eth1" Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:3438 |