Bug 151623

Summary:	hrPartition table doesn't work with LVM
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bradley <bbaetz>
Component:	net-snmp	Assignee:	Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mattdm
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-02-27 09:31:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bradley 2005-03-20 23:56:35 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050302 Firefox/1.0.1 Fedora/1.0.1-1.3.2

Description of problem:
The hrPartitionTable code doesn't know about LVM device formats. The code in init_hr_disk looks for /dev/hd, /dev/sd, /dev/md, and /dev/fd, but thats it.

You could argue that LVM isn't a "partition", but raid devices are there. We use this for working out all the partitions and their mount points, for cricket/etc monitoring.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.1.2-11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
snmpwalk -v 2c -c public host localhost | grep Partition

Actual Results:  No /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 entries, and no hrPartitionFSIndex entry pointing to /

Expected Results:  Entry for /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00, with associated hrPartitionFSIndex entry pointing to the / partition

Additional info:

On my machine, I don't even get /dev/hda1 in the output, although I do on another box that doesn't have any LVM configured.

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2006-07-10 22:45:40 UTC

Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test
release, reopen and change the version to match.

Thank you!

Comment 2 Bradley 2006-07-11 01:27:28 UTC

Still fails:

net-snmp-5.3-4.2 on FC5

Comment 3 Matthew Miller 2006-07-11 15:42:25 UTC

moving to FC5 as per comment #2.

Comment 4 Jan Safranek 2008-01-29 12:43:16 UTC

moving to rawhide - FC5 is not supported anymore. There is ongoing discussion
upstream about LVM, see
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1185358&group_id=12694&atid=312694

Comment 5 Jan Safranek 2008-01-30 13:44:45 UTC

I updated the upstream patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1882621&group_id=12694&atid=312694

Now it waits for upstream acceptance (which usually takes quite long time, even
several months).

Comment 6 Jan Safranek 2008-02-27 09:31:55 UTC

The patch was accepted, you can look forward for net-snmp 5.5