Bug 151893

Summary: sudo 1.6.8p7 is released
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: sudoAssignee: Thomas Woerner <twoerner>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-12 12:29:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 151632    
Attachments:
Description Flags
sudo-1.6.8p7-selinux.patch none

Description Robert Scheck 2005-03-23 10:22:24 UTC
Description of problem:
sudo 1.6.8p7 was released on February 5th, 2005 - and Fedora Core Development
only has 1.6.7p5.

Vendor also says: "Please note: versions of Sudo prior to 1.6.8p2 are affected 
by a potential security flaw that could allow a malicious user to subvert Bash 
shell scripts." 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sudo-1.6.7p5-31

Actual results:
Some patch merging is necessary and sudoedit (copy of sudo) should be removed
including the duplicate of the man page:

@@ -75,6 +66,8 @@
 chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/*
 install -d -m 700 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/run/sudo

+rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{%{_bindir}/sudoedit,%{_mandir}/man8/sudoedit*}
+
 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/pam.d
 cat > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/pam.d/sudo << EOF
 #%PAM-1.0

Expected results:
Upgrade to 1.6.8p7 ;-)

Additional info:
This upgrade would solve bug #151632.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2005-03-23 10:27:21 UTC
Created attachment 112251 [details]
sudo-1.6.8p7-selinux.patch

Hopefully, I didn't do any mistakes at patch merging...

Comment 2 Thomas Woerner 2005-04-12 12:29:42 UTC
Fixed in rawhide in rpm sudo-1.6.8p8-1 or newer.
I had to rebuild the selinux patch, the result is similar to your patch, Thanks.