Bug 152275
Summary: | Consider switching to maildirs in ~ as default mail inbox | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John <jsk29> |
Component: | dovecot | Assignee: | John Dennis <jdennis> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | tss, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-07-28 19:20:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John
2005-03-27 04:34:53 UTC
Thank you for your thoughtful and well reasoned input. I agree 100% with you. However, as you correctly point out this is not a dovecot specific issue. In fact its really a multiple package configuration issue. In particular the LDA has to be configured to deliver (and properly lock) the same location that an IMAP server such as dovecot can read and manipulate. The change to the dovecot default configuration is simple, thats not the issue. The problem is we ship many packages (several MTA's, several POP/IMAP servers, Squirrelmail, procmail, fetchmail, etc.) and we don't know which ones will be combined in the field to comprise an integrated mail solution. Each requires multiple configuration "edits" to bring themselves in alignment with each other. Making a config change to dovecot does not address nor solve this problem. I have long been an advocate of Red Hat producing an email configuration tool that will let the user pick a configuration and mananage each packages configuration (because it has intelligence about the configuration interrelationships). This is the right solution and there is some buy-in this needs to be done. While I agree with you I'm afraid I'm going to close this a won't fix because at the moment I can only update dovecot's configuration file and that is not enough to adequlately address the multiple configuration issues. Hopefully in the not too distant future we'll have an integrated mail configuration utility that handles all the pieces of the puzzle in unison. Yeah, I understand how much is involved with doing this the "right" way. I couldn't figure out where to put the RFE, though, so I put it here. :) Is there a better place to put this comment/request? I can't figure out how to put a report into bugzilla that is relevant to a wide set of packages. I'm glad other people are thinking about the same issues. It took me some time to get things working for myself, and I thought it would be a shame if I didn't document the resulting ideas somewhere. :) John There is a formal procedure for requesting features/enhancements, its called "Feature Tracker". However, to get an item into Feature Tracker you must be a paying customer with access to a TAM (Technical Account Mananger). Since you filed this against Fedora and not the Enterprise product I'm making the assumption you don't have to TAM with whom to file this request with :-( But don't dispair, there is an awareness of the need to do what you're asking and internal advocates for it. I don't think it will be forgotten, it might take longer than hoped, but it won't be lost. I do really appreciate your thoughtful input and even if bugzilla is not the right forum for such requests the presence of such bug reports helps lend credibility to the arugument we need to do this. |