Bug 1523545

Summary:	[QE] Steps for replacing primary gluster server node in RHHI have to be interchanged
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	RamaKasturi <knarra>
Component:	doc-Maintaining_RHHI	Assignee:	Apurva Bhide <abhide>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rhhi-1.0	CC:	abhide, asriram, godas, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sabose, sasundar
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	RHHI-V 1.5
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-02-15 10:08:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1532732

Description RamaKasturi 2017-12-08 09:40:03 UTC

Document URL: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure/1.0/html-single/maintaining_red_hat_hyperconverged_infrastructure/#replacing_primary_storage_node

Section Number and Name: 6, Replacing the Primary Gluster Storage Node

Describe the issue: I see that replacing primary nodes has steps to remove the node first then Replace bricks on this node with the new node which is incorrect. When user tries to remove a node from UI which has bricks and if the bricks are associated with the volume , removal of node fails.

Suggestions for improvement: Step 21 in chapter 6 has to be come before step 28.

Additional information:

Comment 5 Sahina Bose 2018-02-16 05:35:26 UTC

Gobind, can you provide inputs on Comment 4

Comment 6 Gobinda Das 2018-02-16 07:36:01 UTC

Yes the order should be:

1. Replace engine volume brick
2. Remove the old node
3. Remove metadata from the previous host

Comment 8 Gobinda Das 2018-02-26 11:34:53 UTC

Yes now the doc looks good to me.

Comment 10 SATHEESARAN 2018-07-24 08:24:03 UTC

Content looks good