Bug 1525313
| Summary: | Search bar is unreliable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Gibson <dgibson> |
| Component: | atril | Assignee: | Wolfgang Ulbrich <raveit65.sun> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | alt-gtk-de-sig, dgibson, raveit65.sun |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | atril-1.19.6-1.fc27 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-02-06 11:20:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
An example document which demonstrates this problem can be downloaded from: https://openpowerfoundation.org/?resource_lib=ibm-power-isa-version-2-07-b Search, for example, for "hfscr" in this document and the weird behaviour described above shows up. Was this a problem with atril-1.18.1 from f26/f25 ? Confirmed, but it seems that the problem occurs only in continuous mode. Also, it doesn't matter if single or double page is chosen. Do we have a cache problem? Tested with your PowerISA_V2.07B.pdf document. Good that it isn't a problem with the new feature caret-navigation. I'm pretty sure it wasn't a problem in f26 or f25 - I certainly didn't notice it until recently. I didn't notice it until after the fix for bug 1513826 went in. Thanks for pointing out it only reproduces in continuous mode, I hadn't noticed that. That gives me a workaround which will make life much less painful. Can you please test https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23972942 This fixes the regression for me. Hope i don't introduce another one. Looks good to me, thanks! atril-1.19.6-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-78aefc9e33 atril-1.19.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-78aefc9e33 atril-1.19.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. atril-1.19.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Description of problem: Searching documents is weirdly unreliable as of quite recently. There are several symptoms: * Sometimes it reports "0 found on this page" even with one highlighted on this page * Often "Find Next"/"Find Previous" don't find anything even though there are known other matches in the documents * Sometimes rapidly, repeatedly clicking the next/prev buttons will cause it to find matches it didn't with a single click. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): atril-1.19.5-1.fc27.x86_64 This problem has appeared quite recently, but I don't know exactly what package version it started at. How reproducible: At least on certain documents seems to happen most of the time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open large PDF document with some know search terms 2. Press Ctrl-F 3. Type a string know to appear repeatedly in the document 4. Press "Find Next" to step through occurrences of the string Actual results: Generally finds a first match correctly. May print "0 found on this page" even with a match highlighted. Find Next/Find Previous may not find additional matches even when they exist. Expected results: Find Next/Find Previous reliably step through matches in the document. Additional info: Find Previous seems to be slightly more reliable than Find Next, but it's hard to be sure.