Bug 1526161 (CVE-2017-17514)
Summary: | CVE-2017-17514 nip2: Command injection in boxes.c | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Pedro Sampaio <psampaio> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | adam, bgilbert |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-12-01 16:00:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1526162 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Pedro Sampaio
2017-12-14 21:00:18 UTC
Created nip2 tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1526162] The url argument to box_url() never comes from an untrusted source, so I don't think this CVE is valid. Upstream doesn't either. Whoever created the CVE didn't post a report or notify upstream, so it's not clear what attack vector they had in mind. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Bugs doesn't say what to do in this case; should I close the bugs NOTABUG? |