Bug 1531275
Summary: | [Azure]Provision Multiple VMs with Public IP selection options | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Leo Khomenko <lkhomenk> | |
Component: | Providers | Assignee: | Daniel Berger <dberger> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 5.8.0 | CC: | bsorota, cpelland, dberger, gblomqui, jfrey, jhardy, obarenbo, simaishi, smallamp | |
Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | TestOnly, ZStream | |
Target Release: | 5.10.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | 5.10.0.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1552303 1565342 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-07-30 14:44:21 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | Bug | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | Azure | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1552303, 1565342 |
Description
Leo Khomenko
2018-01-04 21:13:48 UTC
Dan, I believe I remember you talking about this one in gitter. Can you summarize that discussion here? If I'm wrong, lemme know. Also, sounds like this might be a dup of some other bug. ... if so, go ahead and just close this as a dup of the other. When provisioning a single VM, the user has a choice to set it to private, public, or to an existing public IP resource. But when provisioning multiple VM's, the user doesn't have any choice. This isn't a dup of the other ticket, as the distinction is single vs multiple VM's. So, what we need to do is alter the UI to allow two options when provisioning multiple VM's - public or private. Dan, work with Bronagh to get help from the UI or GM's team if necessary for updating the provisioning dialogs. I wonder if this is a problem with provisioning in any public cloud. Greg, basically already done, just waiting on Bronagh's approval. https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-azure/pull/210 I would prefer the UI PR to be merged and the Azure provider PR to be updated. I let MartinP know this is for a 4.6.1 blocker: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/3459#issuecomment-367858641 Current PR was merged. We'll refactor the core and UI side at a later date. Closing this as its already been verified in two z-streams and has test coverage around it. |