Bug 1531674

Summary: Operating System Templates are ordered inconsistently in UI.
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Dylan Gross <dgross>
Component: Provisioning TemplatesAssignee: Yifat Makias <ymakias>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Roman Plevka <rplevka>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3.0CC: bkearney, egolov, mhulan, mshira, orabin
Target Milestone: 6.8.0Keywords: EasyFix, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: foreman-2.0.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 12:57:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dylan Gross 2018-01-05 18:55:04 UTC
Description of problem:

   
   If you navigate to "Hosts" -> "Operating Systems" -> specific-OS -> "Templates" tab for two different Operating Systems, the list of template types can be ordered differently.   This makes for side-by-side comparison awkwardness.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

   Both 6.2.12 and 6.3 beta

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  navigate to "Hosts" -> "Operating Systems" -> specific-OS -> "Templates" tab for two different Operating Systems and compare the order.

Actual results:

  Example from customer and local reproducer...
  "Red Hat 7.3" template order....
      Provisioning template
      PXELinux template
      Finish template
      iPXE template
      User data template
      Discovery Kexec template
      Boot disk embedded template

  "Red Hat 6.8" template order ....
      PXELinux template
      iPXE template
      Provisioning template
      Finish template
      User data template
      Discovery Kexec template
      Boot disk embedded template
   
    

Expected results:

   Consistency in the order of template types - Maybe alphabetical (excepting when types are missing due to not being applicable)

Comment 3 Daniel Lobato Garcia 2018-01-15 12:42:22 UTC
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/22269 from this bug

Comment 4 Daniel Lobato Garcia 2018-01-15 12:43:05 UTC
Acked, still a problem - https://gfycat.com/WhiteSolidFinwhale ' cloned to redmine

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2019-08-05 12:22:39 UTC
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.

Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2019-11-13 11:00:40 UTC
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/22269 has been resolved.

Comment 8 Roman Plevka 2020-06-24 09:18:38 UTC
VERIFIED
on sat6.8.0-5

the templates form now displays the items in a consistent order.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 12:57:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366