Bug 153276
Summary: | RHEL4: The 'look' command fails to find 'accel' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Karel Zak <kzak> |
Component: | util-linux | Assignee: | Karel Zak <kzak> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | shei |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-01-11 10:22:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 210559 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Karel Zak
2005-04-04 13:01:19 UTC
Hi, I am really surprised that this bug was created in 2005-04-04 and it has be more than a year and it has not been fixed yet! It's more generic than that -- try 'look a' and it shows NO word at all and this is unique to RHEL derived system. I have traced the culprit to be the file util-linux-2.12p-look-separator.patch. If you comment out applying this patch in spec file and build the package, then the generated 'look' works as expected. This is in RHEL4 U3. (But I tried the 2.13-0.20.4 in Fedora Core 5 and it failed there too.) Hope this helps. Bruce Shei This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. The look command is broken and fix requires update the words package too. It works as expected in FC5, and RHEL5. (so comment #3 about FC is not true from my point of view) *** Bug 214587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |