Bug 1534375
| Summary: | CVE-2018-5336 libtiff: wireshark: Missing recursion limit in epan/tvbparse.c can cause multiple dissectors to crash [fedora-all] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sam Fowler <sfowler> |
| Component: | libtiff | Assignee: | Petr Hracek <phracek> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | nforro, phracek, sfowler, tgl |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security, SecurityTracking |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Release Note | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-06 15:59:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sam Fowler
2018-01-15 06:12:35 UTC
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable. ===== # bugfix, security, enhancement, newpackage (required) type=security # testing, stable request=testing # Bug numbers: 1234,9876 bugs=1534374,1534375 # Description of your update notes=Security fix for [PUT CVEs HERE] # Enable request automation based on the stable/unstable karma thresholds autokarma=True stable_karma=3 unstable_karma=-3 # Automatically close bugs when this marked as stable close_bugs=True # Suggest that users restart after update suggest_reboot=False ====== Additionally, you may opt to use the bodhi web interface to submit updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new Hi Sam, how does this CVE relate to libtiff? Could you explain, or reassign/close this BZ if necessary? (In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #2) > Hi Sam, > > how does this CVE relate to libtiff? Could you explain, or reassign/close > this BZ if necessary? This was a typo, thank you for spotting it! ;) Closing now. |